SERIOUSLY FUN ACTIVITIES FOR TRAINERS, FACILITATORS, PERFORMANCE CONSULTANTS, AND MANAGERS.
Our mission statement, copyright notice, and cast of characters.
The best way to sell the concept of training games.
Faster, Cheaper, Better
Learn and apply Thiagi's secrets of radically-different training design.
An Interview with Matthew Richter by Les Lauber
My long-term associate is grilled by another long-term associate.
4Cs by Matthew Richter
Use this activity as an opener—or a closer.
When To Debrief
Includes some unconventional applications.
Audio Tic Tac Toe
How's your short-term memory?
Learn, Play, Perform by Brian Remer
Brian Remer organizes another NASAGA Chapter conference.
Debriefing: An OQ
Can you come up with unconventional uses for the debriefing technique?
SERIOUSLY FUN ACTIVITIES FOR TRAINERS, FACILITATORS, PERFORMANCE CONSULTANTS, AND MANAGERS.
To increase and improve the use of interactive, experiential strategies to improve human performance in an effective, efficient, and enjoyable way.
Editor: Sivasailam (Thiagi) Thiagarajan
Assistant Editor: Raja Thiagarajan
Associate Editor: Matt Richter
Editorial Advisory Board: David Gouthro, Diane Dormant, Kat Koppett, Les Lauber, Steve Sugar, and <type your name here>
The materials in this newsletter are copyright 2004 by Workshops by Thiagi, Inc. However, they may be freely reproduced for educational/training activities. There is no need to obtain special permission for such use as long as you do not reproduce more than 100 copies per year. Please include the following statement on all reproductions:
Reprinted from PLAY FOR PERFORMANCE. Copyright © 2004 by Workshops by Thiagi, Inc.
For any other use of the content, please contact us (firstname.lastname@example.org) for permission.
All registered subscribers receive PLAY FOR PERFORMANCE free of charge.
However, to prevent us from becoming bankrupt, we have decided to adopt a Busker Protocol. If you like what you read, if you find it useful, and if you'd like us to continue publishing the newsletter, please feel free to chip in with any financial contribution. Our estimated annual cost for this newsletter is $30,000. So we suggest an annual contribution of $30 (which is less than one-third the subscription cost of Thiagi's earlier paper-based newsletter). We would appreciate any amount that you send us, but make sure it is less than $30,000 (since we don't want to make a profit). You can mail your check to Thiagi, 4423 East Trailridge Road, Bloomington, IN 47408 or call us at (812) 332-1478 to charge the amount to a credit card. Or you can charge your credit card online, through Workshops by Thiagi, Inc. Please let us know if you need an invoice for financial record keeping.
Thiagi believes in practicing what he preaches. This is an interactive newsletter, so interact already! Send us your feedback, sarcastic remarks, and gratuitous advice through email to email@example.com . Thanks!
Whenever someone asks me, “So tell me all about the games you play”, I don't.
Instead of telling them, I play a game to demonstrate what it is all about.
Here's an example: A little while back, I had lunch with two founders of a software company dedicated to the design and distribution of computer programs for women. Leslie and Martha wanted me to facilitate their company's first strategic planning meeting. In the course of the conversation, Leslie turned to me and said, “So tell me all about the games you play.”
I pulled out three index cards from my pocket (I never leave home without them) and gave one to Leslie, one to Martha, and kept the third one to myself. I said, “Let's play a quick game. If you win, I'll pick up your lunch tab.”
I kept the instructions very simple. “Write down five words that you associate with games. Do it fast. Don't let anyone else see what you are writing. I want to play too. So I'll write five words also.”
I finished writing before they did, and placed my card in front of me with the written side hidden. After they finished writing, I told them what to do next.
“We are going to play a mind-reading game. Each one of us will take turns guessing one of the words that each of the other two players wrote. We get one point for each correct guess.”
Martha wanted to go first. She guessed that that both Leslie and I would have written the word “fun”. Leslie had “fun”, but I did not. Both women thought that my behavior was strange and began psychoanalyzing my deprived childhood. I reminded them that the play must go on. Leslie decided to take a slightly different approach. She guessed “serious” for me and “rules” for Martha. Martha did have “rules” in her list, but I did not have “serious”. I had “rules” also, but since Leslie did not guess that word, I did not volunteer. When it was my turn, I guessed “computers” for Leslie and “fun” for Martha. Martha protested that I should not use a guess that was used by someone else before, but I pointed out that I was in charge of making the rules.
We spent about 3 minutes playing the game and Martha won. Leslie and I were tied for the second place.
Instead of my telling them “all about games”, in the 3-minute demonstration, I let Martha and Leslie experience the following points:
So did I spend the rest of the lunch meeting pointing out these important principles? No, I just asked questions and debriefed Leslie and Martha. I let them ponder on their experience and come up with applications to their workplace. Sometimes they immediately got the answer and sometimes they did not get it until I gently probed, pulled, and pushed. Sometimes they came up with a brilliant answer that I would have never thought of.
Here are the types of questions that I inserted into our conversation:
No, I did not rattle off these questions and conduct a third degree. I just had a normal conversation and let them talk. (And they did talk.) From time to time, I inserted an appropriate question and let them play with it. Sometimes they asked me questions and I turned them back to Leslie and Martha.
Later in the conversation, Martha glared at me and said, “I know what you are doing. You are brainwashing us about games.” I told her, “No, you are brainwashing yourselves.”
Telling is not selling. When you want to sell anything—whether it is training games or participatory democracy—resist the temptation to preach. Get to a demonstration quickly. Keep the demonstration brief. Give away the control of your demonstration. After the demonstration, ask questions. Listen with an open mind. Let them get to the point.
How would you use this approach tomorrow?
It has been several years since I conducted a public workshop. Based on participant demand, I am ready to conduct one of our most popular and practical workshops. I hope that you will be able to join us.
Outcome. Based on 30 years of field work, Thiagi has created a radical approach to training design and has applied it (along with Matt, Raja, and several client groups) to different projects. In a recent project, for example, Thiagi worked with a client for 3 days to design a complete workshop that should have take 3 months in the client's estimate. This workshop has produced measurable performance improvement among participants.
Duration: 2 days
Location: Palo Alto, California, USA
Dates: June 17-18, 2004
When the professor of the graduate course in Instructional Development asked him what he wanted to do for his semester assignment, Thiagi answered, “I'd like to redesign and repackage this course!” The professor was an open-minded sort so he humored the promising foreign student in his first semester in the U.S. The following semester, the professor used Thiagi's package as the basis for the course. Two semesters later, Thiagi renounced the model that he had been using in a much-cited article, “Help! I Am Trapped Inside an ID Model!”
Since his graduate school days, Thiagi has developed hundreds of training programs all around the world for a wide range of target populations using a wide range of technologies. For the past 10 years, Thiagi has defined, refined, and applied his CCCC model for design a variety of training for his corporate clients.
Having learned from the best, Matt has been applying the CCCC model for several years, designing software programming workshops for high-tech companies, product training for retail organizations, management training for financial institutions, operations training for the government, and communication training for manufacturing businesses.
Educated to be an astrophysicist and computer scientist, Raja is skeptical about all exaggerated claims for “scientific” training design approaches. In recent years, however, he has been applying the CCCC model to the design of eLearning programs in a faster, cheaper, and better fashion.
This column features interviews with outstanding designers and users of interactive experiential activities. Our guest this month, Matthew Richter, is an instructional designer, trainer, and performance consultant for Workshops by Thiagi, Inc. He has designed interactive training for a myriad of different clients, including Charles Schwab, Cadence Design Systems, Ralph Lauren, and Olympus. He is a Past President of NASAGA.
This interview was conducted by Les Lauber.
Les: Matt, would you begin by telling us a little about the work you do around motivation, both as a designer and trainer?
Matt: Sure. I subscribe to a model developed by two psychologists from the University of Rochester, Edward Deci and Richard Ryan. Their work with intrinsic motivation has really changed my life and how I view the world. One of the ways I use their model is to recognize that when people are having fun, they aren't aware of, or at least don't care about :-), any lack of competence they may have. They are too busy playing. Competent people doing a task are motivated people. Now, if they are enjoying themselves, they are more likely to choose to continue the activity. According to Deci and Ryan, autonomy + competence = intrinsic motivation. So, I use those basic principles to guide my designs and delivery.
Les: What was it like the first time you used a training game?
Matt: I was doing an internship at a small training and development company in Rochester, NY. A trainer, named Ginny Hronek, who had the dubious task of training me to train, was (and still is) a fantastic experiential facilitator. She was teaching a session using DiSC and gave me an opportunity to run a game. I bombed…I bombed because I was terrified and shaking; and to protect myself, I talked and talked and talked rather than just letting the game flow. And for the debrief, I told them everything they needed to know :-). Then Ginny saved the day, and gently and kindly facilitated me up (I couldn't go down further).
Les: How did you go about learning how to apply games to performance improvement?
Matt: A wise, old, and wrinkled guru [Thiagi] said activities are simply excuses for debriefs. That fundamental idea really focused me on the notion that running a game wasn't about participants having fun. In fact, fun was really peripheral to the experience. The facilitator must never, ever, lose sight of the performance objective. Otherwise, the game is just a game. And games are silly.
Les: What do you think about when you are selecting or designing games for a particular group?
Matt: What do I want the participants to be able to do at the end of the experience? What is the most effective way to get them there based on who they are? And actually, I try to go into the classroom with several activities that will get me to an objective, and then, based on group needs, group dynamics, the individuality of that specific group, I pick the appropriate activity.
Les: What types of learning games are you playing with groups right now?
Matt: Well, I work for Thiagi, so I have access to approximately 8 trillion games :-). But my favorites are the Hello Game, using variations to generate content; Thirty-Five; and Envelopes.
Les: Where do you go to get your ideas for training games?
Matt: I think my strength is in taking a game someone else designed, and developing an appropriate application for it. For instance, I was running a class recently on Ethics, and developed a simulation that combined several of the attributes of Survivor and Big Brother (the CBS TV Shows). The CBS producers created the formats; I saw the application to my Ethics class. And to me, that is the skill trainers and designers should have. There are plenty of games and activities out there. Applying them and debriefing them appropriately and effectively…well, that's the skill.
Les: How do you adapt those ideas to make them appropriate for learning?
Matt: I always start with the end in mind. What is it I want people to be able to do, or realize as a result of the activity? Now, looking at the frame of the game, what steps need to be tweaked to get me there? What frame will I use to debrief? I love Thiagi's debrief model. It's simple and generally keeps me out of trouble. I also try to live by the principle that the game is the mode of transportation, the performance objective is where I am going. So, I try never to get hung up on the rules of the game, or the flow of the game. I remain flexible, willing to cheat, and open to following the participants. Often, they know how to get to the performance objective better than I do. To quote some Zen master, you have to bend like a reed in the wind.
Les: OK, this is a “fluffy” question, but…suppose you're stranded on a desert island with your wife, Kat, and only two recreational games. What two would you choose, and why?
Matt: If my wife is with me, I choose Scrabble and Yahtzee. I love those games. But really, the games I choose are completely dependent on the person I am with. So, with Thiagi, I would choose WordYacht and Ghost. With you, I would add Penny Wise and 99. With my grandfather, 500 Rummy and Casino. Alone, I like Scrabble and Yahtzee on my handheld. I love games and part of playing the game is with whom you are playing.
Les: Matt, tell us about two examples of games you have used to help people learn: first, tell us about a time when things really went south while you were playing a game with a group. Then, tell us about a time when a group took a game in a direction that surprised you because of how much they learned from it.
Matt: I had just met Thiagi, so we are talking about twelve years ago, and saw him deliver the Meaning of Life Jolt at a conference. I was blown away by the power of it. People were crying and emotionally engaged. It was powerful stuff. I thought I could do it. I mean, I was a very experienced trainer, having been in the business for several months :-). So I took a group I was facilitating through it. If you don't know the jolt, it has to do with values, and works really well when trying to get participants to recognize balance of life stuff. It also has to do with cancer and dying. Being cocky and totally unprepared, I never realized that one of the participants had just lost her husband to cancer a few weeks earlier. She ran out of the class. I had simply blown it. That poor woman…and this idiot had to bring the subject up. One of my mentors, Susan Rundle, always said, “Do no harm.” I had forgotten that principle. This was an extreme example of being so into an activity that I ignored the performance objective, and more importantly, I ignored the needs and dynamics of the group. Great lesson, horrible experience.
As for the positive experience, I'll use the Meaning of Life Jolt again. This time, I was working with a group of executives for a small manufacturing company. The President of the company worked something like a 110 hours a week. Some obscene amount. This time, I did a little non-descript checking. No recent deaths or illnesses. I ran the activity. Now, I expected we would have a great debrief and a few of the participants would get it, and at least think twice when working so hard away from their families. But the President really took the activity to heart. He walked out during the debrief and called his wife to tell her he loved her. According to the CEO, the President began to work less, became more focused, and spent more time at home. By the way, the CEO thought this was a good thing, too. Again, great lesson, but this time, great experience. Same activity, different group, different circumstances.
Les: What do you think it takes to be successful facilitating games for training and performance improvement?
Matt: Flexibility, a willingness to let go of the game for the sake of learning, trusting the participants to get it, the ability to really see what is happening, the ability to effectively debrief.
Les: What is the most important lesson you've learned?
Matt: This is hard work. And I have been at this for a while now. I've made a lot of mistakes, and I've learned and developed. It frustrates me when I hear people say that with a train-the-trainer program, anyone can do what I do. It ain't as simple as it looks. It takes practice, experience, knowledge, skill, and some level of talent. Mostly, it takes hard work. There's a wonderful story my father-in-law told. I don't know where he heard it, but I love it.
In the little Eastern European village of Chelm lived a young man, who considered himself an atheist. Chaim had heard that the very famous “Moishe the Atheist” lived in the neighboring village. Eager to find a like-minded soul to learn from, Chaim made his way through the woods to find Moishe the Atheist and to study with him. After a few days journey, the young man found Moishe's little cottage. He knocked on the door and received permission to enter. There was an old, bespectacled man hunched over the table, half-hidden behind a pile of books.
“Yes,” said the older man.
“I am looking for Moishe the Atheist,” said Chaim.
“I am Moishe,” said Moishe.
“Sir, I am an atheist too, and I would like to be your apprentice,” said the younger man.
Moishe slowly removed his glasses and peered at the stranger. “You are an atheist?” he asked.
“Yes, sir,” replied Chaim.
“Have you read the Torah?” Moishe asked.
“No, sir,” said Chaim.
“Have you studied the Talmud?”
“No, sir,” said Chaim.
“Are you familiar with all our prayers and philosophies?” asked Moishe.
“No, sir!” said Chaim adamantly. “I am an atheist.”
“Ach,” said Moishe, waving the young man away dismissively. “You are not an atheist. You are an ignoramus.”
The lesson for me is study. I read everything I can and realize I haven't dented the pile. I've had leadership roles in large and small organizations. I've managed, and I've studied management. As trainers, we need to be experts in our topics, or we need to have access to the experts. And that learning process is endless. New stuff comes out all the time. Thiagi has been doing this work for 40 years and as good I as think I am, there is so much (it's not quantifiable) to learn from him. And I am always blown away by his passion for his own continuous development.
Les: When you think about the future of games in training and development, what do you see?
Matt: More and more. Hopefully, with the surrounding stuff…good ISD, good debriefing, etc.
Here's a variation of Thiagi's Hello Game that structures participants' interactions and encourages them to explore the training topic. You may use this game as an opener to discover what the participants already know. Alternatively, you may use this game as a closer to encourage participants to review and summarize what they learned from your training session.
To explore key concepts associated with a training topic. For this description, we will use customer satisfaction as the training topic.
Any number, organized into four teams.
30 minutes to 1 hour
Prepare four flip chart pages with the following headings:
Brief the participants. Explain that you would like to find out what the participants already know about customer satisfaction. In order to do this, you are going to play a 4Cs game that will require participants create detailed lists of different aspects associated with the concept.
Define terms. Write these four terms on a flip chart (or project a slide with these terms on the screen). Define and discuss each term.
Form four teams. Divide the participants into four roughly equal-sized teams. (It does not matter if some teams have a extra member.)
Brief the teams. Assign a different "C" term to each team. Explain that each team will have the specific task of collecting information about the assigned category associated with the concept of customer satisfaction. In this process, each team should collect items suggested by every person in the room. Also explain that the teams will have 3 minutes to plan, 3 minutes to collect information, and 3 minutes to analyze and organize the information.
Conduct the planning period. Ask teams to spend the next 3 minutes to plan how they are going to survey the room and gather responses from all participants. Keep track of the time and give a 1-minute warning after 2 minutes.
Conduct the data-collection period. At the end of 3 minutes, announce the conclusion of the planning period. Ask team members to go around the room, interview members of the other teams, and collect information associated with the team's task. Get out of the way and, as before, keep track of the time.
Conduct the data-analysis period. At the end of 3 minutes, ask teams to stop collecting data and return to their original location. Each team should analyze the data, organize the information is suitable categories, and record their findings on a convenient flip chart.
Conduct the presentation period. Invite teams to take turns to present their findings to everyone in the room. Select the teams in any order. After each team's presentation, ask clarifying questions and encourage other teams to add additional information.
Debrief the participants. At the end of all four presentations, discuss the information with the group. Ask for common themes, differences, surprises, and missing items. If any of the items in the lists suggest misconceptions, correct them by asking leading questions. Relate this activity to the rest of your training session.
Debriefing is the process of helping participants to reflect on their experiences and gain insights. For a description of a six-phase model for debriefing, see the previous issue.
You must debrief after a simulation game in order to gain maximum effectiveness from the training activity. The more abstract, complex, and emotionally intensive the simulation is, the more participants will gain from debriefing.
You can also debrief other types of experience activities. You can apply the debriefing procedure to a variety of planned and unplanned events. You can debrief an individual in a coaching mode. You can even debrief yourself.
Here are some unconventional applications of the debriefing process:
Everybody knows how to play Tic Tac Toe. Recently, I designed a variation of this universal paper-and-pencil game to play with one of my older friends.
My friend is worried that her declining ability to recognize faces, remember telephone numbers, recall words, and to concentrate on the content of conversations are all precursors to Alzheimer's. I think that this is just a minor symptom of age-related cognitive decline that can be halted and reversed by exercising one's brain. An effective way to exercise the brain is to play games that require the use of your memory.
You don't have to be old to play Audio Tic Tac Toe, but you need three people to play it. This is how the game goes:
One player is the recorder and has a piece of paper with a 3 x 3 grid that has spreadsheet-like labels for each box:
The recorder marks every move made by the other two players (called contestants) in this grid but keeps the grid hidden.
Contestants visualize the 3 x 3 grid with its numbered boxes. They take turns calling out the box where they want to put their symbol in.
She says, “My first X goes in box C1.”
I say, “My first O goes in box B2.”
She responds with, “My second X goes in box A3.”
I say, “My second O goes in box A1.”
She says, “Box C3.”
I say, “Aha! My third O goes in box C2.”
She says, “My fourth X goes in box B3. And I win!”
The recorder does not say anything until all the boxes are filled or a contestant claims victory.
A contestant wins if she she places her symbol in three boxes in a straight line (as in the usual game of tic tac toe) and announces that she has won.
A contestant loses if
At the end of each game, the next player assumes the role of recorder. Game proceeds as before.
This is just the game to play during long drives. Make sure, however, that the driver is not the recorder.
Keene, New Hampshire, USA—A one-day conference titled Play, Learn, Perform will be held at Keene State College on April 27 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
According to organizers, the hands-on conference is designed to meet the needs of educators and trainers who want to make learning in their classes and workshops more dynamic. Play, Learn, Perform will showcase games, simulations, and other interactive strategies that educators can use to enhance their trainings and make learning stick.
Internationally recognized game inventor, Dr. Sivasailam “Thiagi” Thiagarajan, is the featured presenter. An inventor of hundreds of games used to enhance learning, Thiagi is the president of Workshops by Thiagi, Inc., an organization with the mission of helping people improve their performance effectively and enjoyably.
Other highlights of the program include Powerplay: Inspired By Improvisation. Cathy McNally, trainer and consultant, will use the techniques of improvisational theater to build teamwork, positive attitudes, listening skills, and flexible thinking.
In Wrap it Up! trainer and facilitator Brian Remer will demonstrate a variety of games and activities to summarize and bring to closure any educational event so that participants can return to work with a specific plan for new action.
Conference attendees will come away from Play, Learn, Perform with experience and insight into the use of interactive learning designs, novel interactive techniques that participants can use immediately, a support network for trying out new ideas, and fresh energy from the day's excitement.
The registration fee is US$75; US$50 for educators, students, and non-profit participants. Pre-registration is encouraged. More information is available at www.mds-nh.org or by calling Brian Remer at Monadnock Developmental Services, (603) 352-1304.
OQ is a web-based tool that presents an open question requiring reflection or creative thinking. The OQ page provides you with a convenient form to type your answer and to submit it.
What makes OQ unique is an array of buttons on top of the web page:
Expert Answers. When you click on this button, you see the answers from one or more experts.
Peer Answers. When you click on this button, you see earlier answers from other people. You can compare your answer to these answers.
Exit. When you click this button, you return to your original web page location.
Did you read the article, “When to Debrief” in this issue? This article listed several unconventional uses for the debriefing technique. Think of other situations that can provide learning insights through debriefing. Go to this month's OQ page and add one or more unconventional applications of the debriefing technique.